HOME

 

 

 

 relief

 

 

INFORMATION

click links below

 

EVENT CALENDAR
Office Bearers
About Us
Site Structure

 

 

 

MAGAZINE

click links below

 

Photogallery indexes
Ride Reports index
Ladies of Harley
Member Profiles
Safety Matters
Humour
Newsletters - 2009
Newsletters - past

 

 

CONTACTS

click links below

 

email Editor
email Webmaster

 

 

 

OTHER WEBSITES

click links below

 

Other HOG Chapter Sites
Important Sites
Sites of Interest (Non-HOG)
Ballina Motorcycles

 

 

Supporting Dealer

Ballina Motor Cycles

21 Kerr Street

Ballina NSW 2478

(02) 6686 3022

email Ballina Motorcycles

 

 

in memoriam

 

 

 

 

          HOME

Safety Matters

a page where members can share safety tips

 

HOME

 

 

Say what you want to say about this picture -

it speaks for itself

 

A certain member claims that this tyre was purchased only about 3 years ago, and had only about 3,800 Km on it!!

I won't say what brand it was, but I understand that the story is true.

He (quite wisely) decided to abandon his journey.

 

The rider concerned always checked the tyres prior to each run (as we all do). But (he admits) the check consisted mostly of looking at the back and front wheels and checking that the tread looks ok. However, the check on the rear tyre did not go beyond this - if the front and what was visible of the back seemed ok, then it was assumed that the rest of the tyre was ok also, on the basis that the wheel would be in a different position each time it was checked, and the check was often enough. It was, in effect, a series of random checks.

 

I suppose, statistically speaking, for a large number of random observations with each observation yielding the same result (in this case, tyre ok), it may be fair to say that the chance that a successive observation will yield a different result (tyre not ok) is low. This may be one of the assumptions behind quality control, but in the real world it has no real validity and is surely not to be trusted where your safety is concerned.

 

It's like this: imagine that at 3 am one morning you made an observation every minute for half an hour (a sample of 30 observations, a valid small-statistics sample size). In the whole half hour only six cars passed; this makes for only one car every five minutes. Would you then cross the highway with your eyes closed immediately after the last car you observed has passed, on the assumption that there is a low probability that there would be another car before the next five minutes?

Maybe it's only one in a thousand chance that you may come to grief - a low probability - but would you take even that low probability chance??

 

You cannot trust statistics with your life.

 

So when you make your pre-run tyre check, roll the bike along so that you can observe the whole tyre, all the way around.

 

 

 

 

Send in your story, or your safety tip. Email to: Web-editor

 

 

to top of page

HOME